Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor Population Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: A First Step Toward Personalized Therapy.

BACKGROUND: A major breakthrough in cystic fibrosis (CF) therapy was achievedAQ1 with CFTR modulators. The lumacaftor/ivacaftor combination is indicated for the treatment of CF in pediatric patients above 6 years old. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of lumacaftor/ivacaftor in these vulnerable pediatric populations are AQ2crucial to optimize treatment protocols. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The objectives of this study were to describe the population PK (PPK) of lumacaftor and ivacaftor in children with CF, and to identify factors associated with interindividual variability. The association between drug exposure and clinical response was also investigated. RESULTS: A total of 75 children were included in this PPK study, with 191 concentrations available for each compound and known metabolites (lumacaftor, ivacaftor, ivacaftor-M1, and ivacaftor-M6). PPK analysis was performed using Monolix software. A large interindividual variability was observed. The main sources of interpatient variability identified were patient bodyweight and hepatic function (aspartate aminotransferase). Forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) was statistically associated with the level of exposure to ivacaftor after 48 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first analysis of lumacaftor/ivacaftor PPK in children with CF. These data suggest that dose adjustment is required after identifying variability factors to optimize efficacy. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring as a basis for dose adjustment in children with CF may be useful.

Health-related quality of life in infants and children with interstitial lung disease.

INTRODUCTION: Interstitial lung disease in children (chILD) is a highly heterogeneous group of rare and severe respiratory disorders. The disease by itself, the burden of the treatments (oxygen therapy, corticosteroid pulses, nutritional support) and recurrent hospitalizations may impair the quality of life (QoL) of these children. The aim of the study was to compare the health-related QoL (HR-QoL) in chILD compared to a healthy population and to find out the predictive factors of an altered QoL. METHODS: Patients aged 1 month to 18 years with ILD of known or unknown etiology were prospectively included. Parents and children over 8 years old were asked to fill the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scale ranging from 0 to 100 points. RESULTS: A total of 78 children were recruited in 13 French pediatric centers. Total scores were 11.94 points (P = 0.0003) less for child self-report and 14.08 points ( P < 0.0001) less for parent proxy-report with respect to the healthy population. The clinical factors associated with a lower total score were: extrapulmonary expression of the disease, higher Fan severity score, long-term oxygen therapy, nutritional support, and a number of oral treatments. CONCLUSION: Using a validated quality of life (QoL) scale, we showed that health-related-QoL is significantly impaired in chILD compared with a healthy population. Factors altering QoL score are easy to recognize and could help identify children at a heightened risk of low QoL.

A national internet-linked based database for pediatric interstitial lung diseases: the French network.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) in children represent a heterogeneous group of rare respiratory disorders that affect the lung parenchyma. After the launch of the French Reference Centre for Rare Lung Diseases (RespiRare®), we created a national network and a web-linked database to collect data on pediatric ILD. METHODS: Since 2008, the database has been set up in all RespiRare® centres. After patient's parents' oral consent is obtained, physicians enter the data of children with ILD: identity, social data and environmental data; specific aetiological diagnosis of the ILD if known, genetics, patient visits to the centre, and all medical examinations and tests done for the diagnosis and/or during follow up. Each participating centre has a free access to his own patients' data only, and cross-centre studies require mutual agreement. Physicians may use the system as a daily aid for patient care through a web-linked medical file, backed on this database. RESULTS: Data was collected for 205 cases of ILD. The M/F sex ratio was 0.9. Median age at diagnosis was 1.5 years old [0-16.9]. A specific aetiology was identified in 149 (72.7%) patients while 56 (27.3%) cases remain undiagnosed. Surfactant deficiencies and alveolar proteinosis, haemosiderosis, and sarcoidosis represent almost half of the diagnoses. Median length of follow-up is 2.9 years [0-17.2]. CONCLUSIONS: We introduce here the French network and the largest national database in pediatric ILDs. The diagnosis spectrum and the estimated incidence are consistent with other European databases. An important challenge will be to reduce the proportion of unclassified ILDs by a standardized diagnosis work-up. This database is a great opportunity to improve patient care and disease pathogenesis knowledge. A European network including physicians and European foundations is now emerging with the initial aim of devising a simplified European database/register as a first step to larger European studies.